Descriminationn Against Irish-American Immigrants and Native Americans

Descriminationn Against Irish-American Immigrants and Native Americans Prejudice is an issue with roots coming to as far back as scriptural occasions, and it is sketchy regarding whether racial separation will ever evaporate. A wide range of gatherings of individuals have been dependent upon bigotry after some time. Two recorded instances of individuals who were oppressed as a result of their nationality are Native Americans and Irish-American settlers. In spite of the fact that the circumstances they confronted are not exactly indistinguishable, they have a bounty of likenesses. The Native Americans and the Irish residents who moved to the United States endured a comparable predicament as in the two people groups were abused for their social contrasts just as ousted from their own countries. Prior to all others, fluctuating clans of Native Americans possessed North America. The eleventh-century Norse sailor Leif Eriksson saw exceptionally little bits of the landmass, yet his disclosures never became open knowledge.(Brinkley, 8) It was not until Christopher Columbus’s â€Å"discovery† of North America that Europeans started to build up an enthusiasm for the purported New World. English, French, and Spanish states grew up along the eastern bank of America not long after Columbus’s undertaking. When the provinces announced their freedom from Great Britain and framed the United States of America in 1776, the westbound extension of the white pioneers swelled massively. This interruption upon the terrains of the Native Americans created numerous contentions between the two gatherings. The Americans started to over and over interrupt Native American property, and power the Indians off of their legitimately possessed land. One individual who is regularly connected with the poor treat... ...oppressed horrendously and saw as substandard, and as having a place with a lower level in the social request. The Irish’s acquiescence was affected principally by ideological mechanical assemblies, while the Indians were controlled for the most part by severe powers, for example, military activity. However, the two techniques were compelling in bringing down the individuals in the social rankings, with the goal that they were much of the time ignored and wronged ethically and legitimately. While we can not reclaim what has occurred, we can utilize what has occurred in the past to attempt to forestall such treacheries later on. The initial phase in the answer for prejudice is understanding each other. List of sources: Brinkley, Alan. The Unfinished Nation: A Concise History of the American People, third ed. Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill, 2000. Takaki, Ronald. A Different Mirror: A History of Multicultural America, Boston, MA: Bay Back Books, 1993.

Effective tips for a good marketing campaign on Instagram

Effective tips for a good marketing campaign on Instagram Make Money Online Queries? Struggling To Get Traffic To Your Blog? Sign Up On (HBB) Forum Now!Effective tips for a good marketing campaign on InstagramUpdated On 16/05/2018Author : Ram kumarTopic : Social MediaShort URL : https://hbb.me/2KuCp6k CONNECT WITH HBB ON SOCIAL MEDIA Follow @HellBoundBlogInnovative entrepreneurs know that classical marketing methods are losing field in favor of modern means. Nowadays, people spend a lot of time on social networks, so these communication channels have become multifunctional places where people can share memories and even promote their business.It’s easy and cheap to use an Instagram profile as marketing mean. At first, all you have to do is convert your personal account and make it business related. Then, you will have to start social noor. When you think about this, money is not your main concern. If you are a small business, some tips can help you have the best marketing campaign on Instagram.1. If you have a private profile, switch to a business one.2. Don’t forget to use the free online Instagram marketing tool.3. If you post product teasers, people will see them and might be convinced to buy from you.4. Sponsored ads will promote your product better. They can be photos, videos, a carousel, Dynamic ads, Instagram stories or Canvas.5. Insta stories can be used to highlight a new product or whatever you want your customers to see.6. Partnerships with Instagram influencers help you reach a wider market.7. You can measure impact by collecting photos submitted by users.8. Interactive hashtags draw attention on your posts and invite users to join your campaign or special eventual.9. After you analyse the impact and see which is the best posting time, share new info around those hours. Make sure that you don’t bore users with a lot of posts, because they might Unfollow you.READ4 Questions To Ask Before Choosing A Social Media Platform10. Finding out the right metric is important, therefore you should always measu re progress by looking at Analytics and at customized link shorteners like bit.ly.11. An interesting Bio will increase your customers’ confidence.12. In order to strenghten your partnerships, you can cross-promote your collaborators.13. You can direct users towards seeing the best content on your Instagram profile.14. Sponsored posts are a way to increase traffic and get more users to follow you.15. The graphic is important because if users like it, they will remain connected.16. You can keep track of your posts with an editorial calendar. This tool is also helpful when you want to schedule content and make it appear whenever you want.In the end, we should mention that Instagram market representatives the future, because over 500 million people use it every day. In this case, you have the chance to make your business grow by promoting it all over the world. If you want to start using Instagram for business, you have to learn more on the matter, but you don’t have any reason to w orry. There are a lot of social media experts out there and they can tell you all about it.

The Cold War And The Soviet Union - 1858 Words

Though the Cold War was mainly between the two super powers, the United States and the Soviet Union, it also encompassed their European allies, split by the Iron Curtain. It divided the world into the Warsaw pact and the NATO, cementing Europe’s role in the Cold War though its alliances. The constant threat of the nuclear weapons meant that the Cold War became more psychological war rather than of military actions1. .The United States developed their nuclear weapons to strengthen their own military potential after WWII, but the Soviet Russia took this to be more an offensive tactic after the bombs the devastation of the atomic bombs dropped over Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945. The Cold War then largely became an arms race, due to the†¦show more content†¦This brought together Great Britain, France, Italy, Canada, the Netherlands, Luxembourg, Belgium, Denmark, Norway, Iceland, and Portugal together with the United States, creating N.A.T.O (North Atlantic Treaty Organis ation). This created a powerful alliance that threaten or contained the USSR’s power, which made them bring together all the Soviet bloc countries it dominated in Eastern Europe into the Warsaw Pact 2. With the Soviets creating and successful testing their first atomic bomb sooner than the Americans expected, it meant that the Americans had lost the strategic upper hand. The United States could no longer say that they had the power advantage from nuclear bombs, so set about creating more deadly weapon – ‘the H-Bomb’. Due to the threat of nuclear weapons, this stopped any involvement from the United States during the Hungarian Revolution of 1956, that Russia crushed. The United States supported the ‘liberation of captive peoples’ 3within communist controlled areas, yet were unwilling to involve themselves in yet another war. (2) Due to the losses Europe experienced, Russia and the United States were on a power stage above the rest of the world, due to nuclear proliferation. Nuclear proliferation is ‘the spread of nuclear weapons, either by their acquisition by more states or other actors (horizontal proliferation), or their accumulation by established nuclear states

A Research Study About Maunalua Bay - 1113 Words

2. Study region 2.1 Site details Maunalua Bay is an 8 km embayment located on the island of OÊ »ahu, HawaiÊ »i, with three primary regions of groundwater discharge: Black Point, Kawaikui, and Wailupe (Richardson et al., 2015). Two of these groundwater-influenced coastal locations, Black Point and Wailupe, were considered for this study (Figure 1). Three sites (a, ‘high GW’; b, ‘intermediate GW’; and c, ‘low GW’ zones) that spanned a salinity gradient were monitored from each reef. Site A at Black Point was approximately 5 m offshore of the dominant groundwater submarine spring while site A at Wailupe was situated within 2 m of the dominant groundwater seep. These seeps are roughly 0.5 m in diameter and thought to be fed by preferential flow of†¦show more content†¦However, the groundwater endmembers are not uniform between the two locations as groundwater discharging at Black Point originates from an entirely separate aquifer than groundwater discharging at Wailupe. Previous studies have found marked differences in their respective nutrient compositions. (Ganguli et al., 2014, Swarzenski et al., 2014, Richardson et al., 2015). 2.2 Benthic structure Sand, rubble, and macroalgae dominate benthic cover at sites A and B at Black Point. Seasonal blooms of green macroalgae, Bryopsis pennata, which persisted in the water column and benthos at all sites, were occurring during our Black Point sampling event. Coral cover is highest along the outer perimeter of the reef flat (i.e., site C). Benthic cover at Wailupe is dominated by macroalgae with percent cover ranging from 30 - 50% on average (Amato, 2015). Sand and rubble constitute nearly 20 - 50% of the benthos at all sites. Corals are found predominantly offshore with cover estimated as 2 - 5% at site C while zoanthid cover peaks in the nearshore sites at 2 - 12% (Amato, 2015). 3. Methods 3.1 Long-term instrument deployments A portable NaI(TI) scintillation detector, or ‘GW Sniffer’ (Alpha Spectra, Inc.) was used to measure 222Rn in water over one hour integrated time periods using methods by Dulai et al. (2015). The GW Sniffer was encased in a steel house frame and deployed over a period of thirty days at Black Point (August 2015) and twenty five days at Wailupe (September 2015).

World War 1 Peace Conference - 1094 Words

Modern History Account for the different goals of the Big Three Allied leaders at the Paris Peace Conference The Paris Peace Conference took place in 1919 to set the peace terms for the defeated Central powers. Three men took charge called ‘The Big Three’ and they were President Woodrow Wilson of the United States, Prime Minister David Lloyd George of Great Britain and George Clemenceau of France. The Conference was initially planned as a pre-meeting to set the terms of what they were going to ask from Germany, but the pre-meeting quickly became the meeting where the decisions were made because they each had different ideas about what the terms of the treaty should be. â€Å"The Big Three† During the Paris peace conference†¦show more content†¦Poland to become an independent State with access to the sea - An independent Polish state should arise which should include the territories inhabited by indisputably Polish population, which should be assured a free and secure access to the sea 14. League of Nations to be set up – a general association of nations to be formed up for the purpose of affording mutual guarantees of political independence to small states Many people in Britain and France disagreed with his fourteen point plan. Wilson also created the League of Nations which was an intergovernmental organization. It was an organization whose principal mission was to maintain world peace and that war never broke out again. Wilson demanded a fair treaty that created a League of Nations and allowed for self-determination of all minor states. Treaty of Versailles The meeting of the Treaty of Versailles The Treaty of Versailles was one of the peace treaties at the end of World War 1. It took 6 months of negotiations at the Paris Peace Conference to conclude the peace Treaty which Germany had to accept or they will be invaded by the allies. Germany had to: * Return Alsace-Lorraine to France * Give Eupen and Malmedy to Belgium * Give up Sheleswig to Denmark * Give Danzig up to make it a free international city * Give WestShow MoreRelatedTreaty of Versailles was the End of World War I1731 Words   |  7 PagesAt the end of World War 1, all of the parties involved wanted to know what the terms of peace entailed for their country. To determine these details, the Paris Peace Conference, also known as the Versailles Peace Conference, was held in Versailles. The conference began in January 1919 and lasted until June 28 when the Treaty of Versailles was signed. Hundreds of allies and countries that fought in World War I were at the Paris Peace Conference to discuss the outcome of the war, although countriesRead MoreWorld War I And The Atomic Bomb1742 Words   |  7 PagesMAIN PARAGRAPHS 1. Introduction/briefly what it is 2. Exactly what it is (explain end of World War 2) 3. Reparations of Germany 4. Tensions with Soviet Union that led to cold war 5. Surrendering of Japan/ atomic bomb 6. Conclusion / overview of impacts PARAGRAPH 2- EXPLAIN WHAT IT WAS (WHAT IS THE POTSDAM CONFERENCE/HOW DOES IT RELATE TO WORLD WAR 2/WHAT WERE its GOALS) †¢ World war 2 left Europe in ruins (6) †¢ Allied powers defeated axis powers (6) o Allied- United States, Great Britain, SovietRead MoreDBQ 191065 Words   |  5 Pages In 1939 the world was plunged into World War II because of the Munich Agreement. The Munich Agreement was an agreement regarding the Sudetenland Crisis between the major powers of Europe after a conference held in Munich in Germany in 1938. The Sudetenland was an important region of Czechoslovakia. The Treaty of Versailles was the peace treaty created as a result of six months of negotiations at the Paris Peace Conference of 1919, which put an official end to World War I between the AlliesRead MoreThe World s Understanding Of Human Rights990 Words   |  4 Pagesthat occurred in World War I and II that change the world’s understanding of human rights. I think the events that happened in the World War II is what made the world understand what human rights is. The world war started because of assassination of Archduke of Austria Hungary. Then the actual war started because Austria Hungary declared war on Serbia. The first world war I caused such a disaster such as failure of economic, failure of political and poverty. The Second World War II was worse thanRead MoreThe Ever Increasing Urgancy for World Peace1421 Words   |  6 Pagesviolent times in recorded history. There were over 98 million war related deaths, which is about six times the combined deaths of both the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. Orwell conveys each of these killings as â€Å"one mind less, one world less.† World peace would be an important goal to work towards. Many wanted to achieve world peace, however, there were many different visions for how this could be accomplished. Despite the many anti-war actions that occurred during the previous centuries, the twentiethRead MoreThe Paris Peace Conference Of 19191202 Words   |  5 PagesOwen McManus Mrs. Shandera, Mrs. Swartz English 11 Pd.8, AP History Pd.1 10 February 2017 Creating More Problems The Paris Peace Conference of 1919 opened on the 18th of January, with delegations from all over the world attending to lay claim to their desires, or gain reparations for their sacrifices throughout the greatest war the world had ever been subject to. The big four countries at the negotiating table were the British under Lloyd George, the French led by Georges Clemenceau, The ItaliansRead MoreWorld War I And The Treaty Of Versailles1604 Words   |  7 PagesHave you ever wondered why World War II happened despite World War I being the war to end all wars? World War I lasted four years and was very gruesome. Much of the Western Front was destroyed and about 10 million people died. Germany ended the war by ceasing fire and making an armistice on November 11, 1918. The Allied Power had successfully defeated the Central Powers and America had accomplished their goal to end the war. After the surrender from Germany, the Allied Power met up to make a treatyRead MoreComments of the Germa n Delegation to the Paris Peace Conference 1919709 Words   |  3 Pagesthe Paris Peace Conference 1919 1. According to the authors of Germany’s complaint. The various provisions of the treaty hurt Germany’s economy by forcing Germany to accept full responsibility for the damages caused not only by the Germans but also by everyone associated with them and the damage that was caused. As stated in the article, Comments of the German Delegation to the Paris Peace Conference, 1919 President Wilson recognized in his speech of 1916 â€Å"no single fact caused the war, but thatRead MoreWoodrow Wilsons Fourteen Points on the Paris Peace Settlement931 Words   |  4 Pages1. Assess the impact of Woodrow Wilson’s fourteen points on the Paris Peace Settlement and determine whether Wilson was successful in his goals. The Paris of Peace conference was held on January 1919 in Versailles just right outside of Paris. Paris of Peace conference was called to establish reasonable terms to make peace with the countries after World War I. In that conference there was almost thirty nations that were participates. The â€Å"Big Four† were there as well, the big four consisted of GreatRead MoreThe Paris Peace Conference and Versailles Treaty Essay1565 Words   |  7 PagesFailure At the end of World War I (WWI), as with most wars, it was necessary to hold a peace conference and due to the number of countries involved in the war, this task was extremely imposing. The desired conclusion of this conference was world peace, but with approximately 75% of the world nations represented and each country having it’s own agenda, the search for peace was elusive because of a desire for vengeance. This vengeance may have set the stage for World War II. On January 12th, 1919

Cell Phones Social Interactions In A Wireless Era - Free Sample

Question: Part A Locate the following article using the librarys electronic journal collection: Humphreys, Lee. 2005. Cellphones in Public: Social Interactions in a Wireless Era New Media Society 17(6): 810-833 The article describes and analyzes how people use and respond to cellphones in public spaces, more specifically, it is concerned with the question of how social norms of interactions in public spaces are mediated by cellphone behavior. Once the article is read, the following questions must be answered in the introduction of your study: What are the basic differences between a single and a with? How does the author define cross talk? What sort of examples are provided by the author? Identify and briefly describe the different stages or scenarios in which cellphone cross talk can occur. Part B Select and identify a public area on the university campus where you can observe cellphone behavior during three separate sessions of 30 minutes each. You may choose the same setting and time OR for variety, may decide on a different setting or time for each of the three 30 minute observations. Remember to include your justification for choosing the times locations of your observations in your essay. Arrive at the setting and choose a place where you can comfortably observe what people are doing. Bring a notepad for recording observations. As you design your study, briefly describe the question that was the focus of your research. Note that you can choose either to observe cellphone voice calling or texting or other cellphone activities but you must differentiate and choose one of them only to study. Whatever the objective, your research should consider the concept of cross talk and ideas presented by the author of the above article. Part C Take fields notes of your observations. Be as detailed as possible when describing the setting, and especially, the kinds of behaviors about cellphone use in public spaces you are witnessing. Use the following template for each of your three observations; Observation Number:____ Location:_____________ Description of the social environment:___________ Dates of observations:_____________ Time begun:__________ Time concluded:___________ Field Notes:____________________________________________________________________ Upon completions, you will have several pages, and these are to be handed in along with your study results. Part D Once you have completed your three observations, use your field notes to answer the following questions, which will be incorporated into your results/discussion section of your paper. Does your study confirm any of the different stages or scenarios of cross talk identified by Humphreys? Which ones? What are two or three major insights or questions that emerge from your observations? What did you learn about conducting observations? What additional features would you add to this study in order to make it more comprehensive (further work)? Answer: Introduction The article on the social affect of cell phone technology on the social behavior f the individual by Lee Humphrey shows the experiments and the observations of the author about the changes in the individual behavior. The observation part in the article shows that if an individual is engaged in a phone call then the partner shows expressions of anxiety and annoyance and tries to be engaged in some other activities. Further, the article also determines the use of cell phones in public space to better understand the power dynamics of social relations (Hammersley, 2013). Part A The basic difference between a single and a with as mentioned in the article shows that a person is considered to be single by the society if the person does not have any company (Humphreys, 2005). Compared to the with person the single is considered to be potentially undesirable and is in a vulnerable mental condition. With on the contrary are the individuals showcasing huge accompaniment from different individuals showing a state of social desirability. Cross talk refers to the conversation between one of the partners of with with some other individual over the telecommunication channels like cell phone. Some of the instances of cross talk are seen in cases of cell phone conversations, and outsider disruption in between a conversation (Humphreys, 2005). The first stage of cross talk occurs when the cell phone rings and the person has to decide on how to handle it. The third stage of the cross talk is encountered when a third party interrupts the two parties having face-to-face conversation. The fourth stage of the cross talk occurs when the person interacts with the third party and simultaneously with the partner. The fifth and the rare stage is encountered when the individual interacts with the physical partner and the person over the phone at equal time (Konijn, 2008). Part B Location For observing, the social issues relating to cell phones in public spaces the researcher chose the canteen caf within the university campus. The justification behind the choice of canteen cafes being the large number of social conversations are initiated in these areas and the probability of receiving phone calls are also high in canteens and cafes. The choice of this location helped the researcher to have effective observations. The researcher will take the middle seat in the canteen so that the researcher will have a full view of the overall social environment of the canteen (Weisskirch, 2011). Time setting The researcher conducted the survey twice a week for 30 minutes each allocated for three types of observations. The researcher maintained a gap of one week was in between the observation. The researcher did this alteration to get diverse range of target representatives (DE LAME, 2010). Research question The researcher focused on three types of observations namely observation on social effect of cell phone voice calling, observation on effect of cell phone texting and observation of generation of cross talk in cell phone activities (Salkind, 2010). Observations The researcher selected the cell phone voice calling observation in order to analyze the occurrence of cross talk and the social effect of the same. The observation shows that cross talk occurs when an individual accepts the phone call irrespective of being in middle of a face-to-face conversation. In the first observation it is seen that the since the partner is engaged in phone call hence the single partner tries to occupy himself with activities like reading of the menu card in canteen, focusing on visitors of canteen. The observation shows that because of cross talk the individuals adopt various defense mechanisms. In the second observation, the single person is seen to be engaged in a phone call to avoid the apprehension and annoyance. This keeps the single person engaged in social behavior and is not left alone. In the third observation, the individuals eavesdrop on the cross talk between the partner and the third party. The action is not intentional however, it is a structured action of the single partner in order to avoid (Shaw Allen, 2012). Part D Results and discussions From the observations, it is clear that the stages of cross talk as discovered by Humphrey in the article are relevantly seen in the study. However, the observations do not confirm with the fourth stage of cross talk (Lin, 2010). The other stages of cross talk are present within the observations. The observations made here are in accordance to the cross talk emergence due to phone calls. However, there was no instance of third party cross talk. The first observation confirms with the first stage of cross talk. The third and the fourth stage of cross talk occurs when a third party interrupts a face-to-face conversation and the individual decides to interact with the third party. In the research study since no third party observation is seen hence the third and te fourth stage of cross talk cannot be noticed (Tufford Newman, 2010). From the observation it can be derived that cross talk can be avoided in certain stages by the third party as well as by the individual. The use of the cell phone shows the social behavior of the person and the social obligation of the individual. The research project helped the researcher in understanding the directness of field observation (Baym, 2010). However, the observation process lacks practicability and the researcher had to abide by the social ethics and avoid eavesdropping on the private conversations of the participants. Observer effect is another limitation that occurs in case of observational studies (Miller, 2012). As a future prospect, the researcher can make observational analysis of the other aspects of cell phone behavior. Moreover, the researcher can also conduct a primary data analysis on a selected sample group in order to record their behavior in accordance to use of cell phone in public space. This will further help the researcher to get accurate responses from the participants about their emotions of being single. Moreover, to extend the research the research in future can adopt a study of the new and emerging technologies and explore the social, economical, political and cultural context of the technology (Thyer, 2012). Reference list Baym, N. (2010).Personal connections in the digital age. Cambridge, UK: Polity. DE LAME, D. (2010). The cell phone. An anthropology of communication by Horst, Heather A. and Daniel Miller.Social Anthropology,18(2), 234-235. Hammersley, M. (2013).What is qualitative research?. London: Bloomsbury. Humphreys, L. (2005). Cell phones in Public: Social Interactions in a Wireless Era New Media Society 17(6): 810-833 Konijn, E. (2008).Mediated interpersonal communication. New York: Routledge. Lin, J. (2010). Acquired Cognitive Behavior Changes in Children from Cell-Phone Use [Health Effects.IEEE Microwave,11(4), 112-114. doi:10.1109/mmm.2010.936483 Miller, T. (2012).Ethics in qualitative research. London: SAGE. Salkind, N. (2010).Encyclopedia of research design. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage. Shaw, D., Allen, T. (2012). A Systematic Consideration of Observational Design Decisions in the Theory Construction Process.Syst. Res.,29(5), 484-498. doi:10.1002/sres.2157 Thyer, B. (2012). The scientific value of qualitative research for social work.Qualitative Social Work. doi:10.1177/1473325011433928 Tufford, L., Newman, P. (2010). Bracketing in Qualitative Research.Qualitative Social Work,11(1), 80-96. doi:10.1177/1473325010368316 Weisskirch, R. (2011). No Crossed Wires: Cell Phone Communication in Parent-Adolescent Relationships.Cyberpsychology, Behavior, And Social Networking,14(7-8), 447-451. doi:10.1089/cyber.2009.0455 Appendix Part C: Observations Observation Number: one Location: University Canteen Description of the social environment: Social conversation between two male friends Dates of observations: Day 1 of week 1 Time begun: 11 in the morning Time concluded: 11.30 in the morning Field Notes: One of the partners receives a phone call. He decides to take the call. While he is busy over the call, the other partner distracts himself by staring at the canteen menu. As the call extends the single partner shows actions of annoyance. Observation Number: two Location: University Canteen Description of the social environment: An ongoing social conversation is noted between a male and a female participant Dates of observations: Day 4 of week 2 Time begun: 4 O clock in the evening Time concluded: 4.30 in the evening Field Notes: The male participant receives a phone call and decides to attend the call. The female partner being left single decides to make a phone call to a certain person as a form of defense mechanism in order to avoid being single. Observation Number: Three Location: University Caf Description of the social environment: Two female participants are engaged in a deep conversation Dates of observations: Day 15 of week 9 Time begun: 2.30 in the afternoon Time concluded: 3.00 in the afternoon Field Notes: one of the female participants receives a phone call in between the deep conversation and decides to attend it. Initially the partners shows annoyance and as the phone conversation proceeds the other female partner unintentionally eavesdrop on the private conversation of her partner.

Wife Of Bath Characters Essays - The Canterbury Tales

Wife Of Bath Characters Upon a first reading of the Wife of Bath's Prologue, it's hard not to feel the need to pat her on the shoulder and say ?Go-girl!? There's no denying the impact that Feminism has had on our Millennium-revved society, and the Wife of Bath's character would certainly have contradicted the oppressive customs of Chaucer's time. But on closer inspection, it would seem that the Prologue could be considered a medium for an anti-feminist message, under the semblance of a seemingly feminist exterior. She confesses her treatment of her husbands and her tendency to ?swere and lyen,? and this self-incrimination invokes a feeling that the Wife is an extraordinarily attractive character by sharing her feminine faults with us, good-humouredly. At the same time, her robust energy and her arguments against anti-feminists; her comments about clerks being unable to do ?Venus werkes? and taking it out on ?sely wyf(s)? in print, are carried further in the Tale, where the ending arguably serves as a climax, summarising many of the Wife's themes. In her Prologue, her arguments in favour of marriage show a hearty common sense, but they are suspect ? while it is true that marriage peoples the earth and replenishes existing stocks of ?virginitee,? her own marriages do not seem to have produced any offspring, and while it may be ?bet [?] to be wedded than to brinne,? her marriages, despite her claim that ?in wyfhood I wol use myn instrument,? do not seem to have prevented her from ?goon a-caterwaw[ing]? and by decision engaging in fornication (?I ne loved nevere by no discrecioun/But evere folwede myn appetit,/Al were he short, or long, or blak, or whit?), which is after all what marriage was, according to her, supposed to prevent. From the account she gives of her marriages, it becomes increasingly obvious that marriage for her is not quite so beneficial as one might think ? the only benefit the husbands get, in exchange for their ?purgatorie,? is that of her ?bele chose? (which, it must be pointed out, they ? with the possible exception of Jankin, who satisfied her better than ?bacon? ? have to share with other ?good felawes?), but it is worth observing that she never speaks of the sexual act as giving the male partner pleasure (except with regard to ?daun Salomon? ? but she identifies with him rather than his wives: ?As wolde God it were leveful unto me/ To be refresshed half so ofte as he!?) ? on the contrary, she speaks of the husband's ?dette? to his wife, of ?How pitously a-night I made hem swinke!? and of ?his tribulacion withal/ Upon his flessh.? Also, while she claims Biblical support for her views on marriage, the support that she cites is conveniently edited to suit her purposes (for example, Solomon did have 700 wives and 300 concubines ? but his appetites led to his turning away from God; and the marital relationship specified in the Bible is a reciprocal one rather than the one-sided one she speaks of, tilted in favour of the wife ? she conveniently ignores that while ?Apostel [?]/[?] bad oure housbondes for to love us weel,? he also exhorts women to love their husbands), and she elsewhere ignores the Bible when it proves difficult to ?glose? in her favour (as in her dismissal of its order to dress ?in habit maad with chastitee and shame?). Moreover, her behaviour is a demonstration of all the anti-feminist accusations that she (falsely) claims her husband/s of levelling at her (the ultimate irony, since she is proving the truth of these very accusations at the very time when she is making them up). She does dress gaily (cf. Her stockings ?of fyn scarlet reed?) ? and probably for the same reasons that she goes ?walkinge out by night?, it is doubtful that she ?abides? in ?chastitee,? she is devious and deceitful (making up the accusations in order to pre-empt any on the part of the husband/s), she is self-willed (?we wol ben at oure large?) and she is arguably like ?bareyne lond? and ?wilde fyr? (she has no children, and has ?consumed? five husbands). To see the Wife of Bath's Prologue as being merely an anti-feminist vehicle would be to ignore the frequent ambiguity that is displayed in the Prologue as the Wife charms her way through her shameless and yet strangely winning confession (it should be noted that she is earlier described as having been ?a worthy womman al hir live? in the General Prologue, despite her five ?housbondes?